"The groundwork of all happiness is health." - Leigh Hunt

Why did we create a phone-sized device to take blood diagnostics out of the lab and into the true world?

When your doctor thinks you will have an infection or an allergy, an easy blood test should provide a solution inside hours. But in a lot of the world, that test can take days — or never occur. The problem is often not the test itself, but a neglected step between getting your blood drawn and getting diagnosed.

In most hospitals in high-income countries, separating plasma from blood is so routine that almost all people never give it some thought. A nurse takes your blood, sends it to a lab, and spins it at high speed in a machine called a centrifuge to separate the liquid plasma from the cells. The lab staff then looks for signs of infection, an immune response, or bacteria, and your doctor uses those results to determine on treatment.

But centrifuges require electricity, regular checks and trained staff. When these items aren't available or the lab is overwhelmed, testing slows down.

It doesn't just affect rural clinics or refugee camps. It may also occur through the busy winter months in emergency departments in wealthy countries. If plasma can't be separated quickly with consistent, top quality, care is delayed even when rapid tests are able to use.

The scale of the issue became clear when my colleagues and I checked out how doctors work on a day-to-day basis. A standard pattern emerged when individuals with long-standing, allergy-like symptoms were often told something like: “For now, try antihistamines, and if things get worse we can arrange an exam.” Tests were avoided not because they didn't exist, but because they were too slow, too expensive, or too distant.

A quiet barrier

This raises a fundamental query about health care: If diagnosis is step one toward treatment, why is it held back by cost, infrastructure, and geography? The answer lies in sample preparation and testing – the quiet bottleneck at the center of the method.

It was now clear that the primary major obstacle to maintaining vision was the dependence on specialized equipment. The challenge became clear: overcome this dependency and testing could happen within the clinic or anywhere.

This problem manifests itself in other ways in several countries, but the essential pattern stays the identical. In India, where I live, many individuals can get to a physician but avoid testing due to the delayed results and high costs. Therefore, treatment is commonly based on symptoms.

During the Increase in dengue In Brazil and Indonesia, tuberculosis care Rural South Africaand COVID Or look after the RSV waves within the U.S. and U.K. slowed not because tests were missing, but because samples relied on busy, centralized labs that patients or hospitals couldn't easily access.

In many field clinics and emergency health camps, teams should rely heavily on supplies. A team can plan to run hundreds of tests a day, but they do little or no because someone has to separate the plasma from each blood sample before the test begins.

One potential solution got here from an unlikely place: a paper towel. If you have ever dipped the top of a chunk of paper towel into water, you have noticed that the water “climbs” onto the paper. My colleagues and I developed a tool we call Hemosoft that uses this principle (called “capillary action”) to separate red blood cells from straw-colored plasma (the a part of the blood needed for testing).

Hemosoft uses capillary motion to attract blood through tiny channels, and something easy happens along the best way: plasma moves forward while red blood cells fall behind, just as fast and slow traffic arrange themselves in several lanes. In lower than five minutes, it produces cell-free plasma with no pumps, no electricity, and no moving parts.

Hemosoft device.
Perth Shindefor , for , for , . By CC

Hemosoft has passed bench-top testing with fluids like blood on a nanofabrication and microfluidics facility. IIT Bombay and has moved into preliminary testing using donated patient blood samples. More samples are actually being tested to generate robust and reliable data.

Hemosoft encourages us to rethink where evaluations happen. Rather than asking learn how to move more laboratory services to more locations, it asks why diagnosis must depend on a single lab.

By removing the infrastructure bottleneck, rapid testing can reach places where it was previously not possible: rural health posts, mobile clinics, refugee camps, or overwhelmed emergency departments during outbreaks.

The goal of our device—which my colleagues and I are actually developing in our startup, TVASTR Biotech—just isn't to interchange laboratories, but to expand the spaces where diagnostics can happen. With an easy plastic device, a healthcare employee can't only listen to a patient, but provide a response – wherever they meet.