A healthy NHS and a powerful economy depend upon healthy people, not only strong public funds. Chancellor Rachel Reeves' budget was a missed opportunity for the federal government to get serious about public health by protecting residents. Major risk factor For Death in Britain: Unhealthy Eating.
If a multinational corporation were dumping chemicals in our water. NHS cost £19 billion A yr (fat price), this company will probably be asked to pay the bill. This is the “polluter pays” principle.
The same principle should apply to food as well. Instead multinational food firms are cashing in on the sale of unhealthy food. For example, PepsiCo, which incorporates brands corresponding to Pepsi MAX, Walkers and Doritos, Achieved net income of over £70 billion. In 2023, globally.
Reeves' budget states that the soft drinks industry levy will increase consistent with inflation. From 1st April 2025The lower rate of levy will increase from 18 pence per liter to 19.4 pence per litre. And the highest rate will rise from 24 pence per liter to 25.9 pence per litre. (The lower rate applies to drinks with added sugars of 5 to 7.9 grams per 100 ml of total sugar, and the upper rate applies to drinks with 8 grams or more per 100 ml.)
Such levies lead to higher food prices if firms pass the levy on to residents. Which is precisely what they sometimes do.
Evidence suggests that the levy has been effective in reducing sugar consumption within the UK, nevertheless it could do more.
According to the World Health OrganizationAs of July 2022, 108 countries have a tax on sugary drinks, a lot of that are significantly higher than the UK rate. For example, within the United Arab Emirates (UAE), there’s a 50 percent excise tax on carbonated beverages And one hundred pc tax on energy drinks.
In contrast, within the UK, changes to the soft drinks levy in the brand new budget are projected to extend prices. A 330ml can of “high band” soft drink for just three pence from 2029 to 2030.
Many countries transcend sugary drinks to tax other foods, corresponding to those high in fat, salt or sugar. Again, within the UAE example, a 50% excise tax applies to any product with added sugar or other sweeteners. Of course, 18 countries Tax foods high in fat, salt and sugar.
Mexico was among the many first countries to adopt such a policy, imposing an 8% tax on discretionary foods corresponding to confectionery, chocolate, sweet breakfast cereals, crisps and other salty snacks. After implementation, there was a vital Decrease in sales of these unhealthy foods.
JRomero04 / Shutterstock
Pay the polluter.
In the UK, the brand new budget could go further in raising funds and rebuilding the NHS by increasing the soft drinks levy on foods high in fat, salt and sugar.
The government's ten-year plan for the NHS is resulting from be published in spring 2025. Many have advocated a plan to give attention to prevention. But the concept that the NHS must be answerable for prevention perpetuates the concept that individuals are answerable for unhealthy diets and obesity. It places the blame on firms that process, promote and benefit from high fat, salt and sugar foods on individuals and the NHS. Instead, why not demand that polluters pay?
A healthy population is the inspiration of economic growth. If the federal government wants a healthy NHS and a powerful economy, make multinational corporations, not residents, pay for the damages brought on by the unhealthy products which can be sold to us and our kids day by day.