Evolution is traditionally related to the technique of increasing complexity and getting recent gene. However, the genomic era explosion shows that the evolution of species is more often practiced than the lack of genes and pre -simplicity, and so they are supportive of latest biological adaptations that facilitate the survival of organisms. This evolutionary driver, which is understood to be anti-intuitive-“is less” in genetic terms-now reveals a tremendous dimension that responds to a brand new evolutionary concept of “low, but more”, namely, the tendency for mass gene losses after an enormous extension by the replication of gene.
It is one of the necessary results of an article published within the journal, headed by a team headed by the Genitics section of the Faculty of the University of Biology and a team for the University of Barcelona's Biodiatti (IRBIO) Institute, which can also be participated by the Okinawa Institute of Technology and Technology. This article identifies recent evolutionary patterns, and descriptions a brand new scenario, which identifies a variety of genetic change and evolutionary adaptation through mass gene damage and transcripts in organisms.
Less, but more: a brand new evolutionary scenario
There are still many questions on the consequences of the lack of gene on the species and the looks of evolutionary innovations within the planetary tree of life. “The loss of the gene is a widespread mechanism on the whole biological scale and represents a evolutionary stimulus that can cause genetic variability and can also cause biological adaptation, and it is traditionally known as 'low' assumptions,” the leader of the State's Department of Development and the Development of the State Department.
Now, the brand new dissertation describes a brand new evolutionary framework called “low, but more” that increases the importance of the lack of gene as a evolutionary stimulus force to the previous model.
This study, which is part of Gasper Sanchez Serena's doctoral thesis, focuses on the genome study of the species, which is a swimming biology of marine zoos that belongs to tuniats. In this study model-an independent living tonic or appendicoline-team reorganized the evolutionary history of the Fiberblast Growth Factor (FGF) gene families, that are necessary in the event of the biology.
“These results show that the loss process has reduced the number of families of FGF Growth Factor Jane, which is FGF9/16/20 and FGF11/12/11 14 families. These survivors have doubled ten generations to produce a total of ten generations in appendicoline.” “Specifically, FGF 9/16/20 and FGF 11/12/13/1 can represent a minimum set of 14 sub -families, which have the secretary and intra -cellular functions, respectively, and can show important information about the evolution of the FGF system.”
From Cism Life to Active Swimming
This study provides a brand new perspective concerning the evolution of the FGF sub -families within the Coordate Group, which, after being faraway from the Skydine, has widespread losses and duplicates of the families of the ancestral gene coming to the bottom of the appendicular lineage. All these changes have played an important role within the moral deviation between different species of the tuniats of free life, comparable to.
“Our study offers a new assumption on how the loss of genes and copies can be related to developmental changes. We are talking about the changes in the evolutionary innovations and the physical projects-which created the evolution of the evolution from the scidine-like cismic lifestyle, like the epilepsy.”
The study also indicates differences within the structure of individuals from different parts of the world, which provides the primary molecular evidence of how the rapidly manufactured population is taking the status of secret species (ie, probably the most similar in the identical class is similar in morphology and genome.
Christine's Castro concluded that “less, but more” evolutionary models “helps us understand how recent possibilities of losing are sometimes opened, and subsequently, the disadvantages of the evolutionary origin of latest adaptation are crucial.